Topic summary

⁠46%1 analyzed article/video438 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Supreme Court Ethics results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 482 hits. Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (3,587 of 12,592 topics). This Supreme Court Ethics is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.

Supreme Court Ethics

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Child Abuse And Neglect	1%
⁠72%	Supreme Court Ethics (selected)	5%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,752

Article count: 1

Authors

Akela Lacy

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Supreme Court Ethics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Supreme Court Ethics vs sitewide

Supreme Court Ethics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Harlan Crow Maxed Out Campaign Donations to John Fetterman⁠^36%

The Intercept⁠^81%By Akela Lacy⁠^83%7/16/2026, 12:08:31 AM