Topic summary
2%1 analyzed article/video1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Super Pac Spending results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 969 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,793 of 16,816 topics). This Super Pac Spending is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Super Pac Spending
Topic details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Super Pac Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Super Pac Spending vs sitewide
Super Pac Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos