BS Summary: These Sudan Conflict results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 938 faulty-reasoning hits from 504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 10,866 topics). This Sudan Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sudan Conflict
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%War And Religion0%
⁠0%U S Bases0%
⁠0%Sugar Detox0%
⁠0%Social Exclusion0%
⁠0%Sfmta0%
⁠100%Book The Look59%
⁠100%Beauty Standards59%
⁠100%Washington State Budget60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Sudan Conflict (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 504
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sudan Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sudan Conflict vs All Other Publications
Sudan Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.