Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Submarines results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 563 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (13,383 of 22,971 topics). This Submarines is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Submarines
Topic details
Total words: 2,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos