Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video1,419 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stu Holden results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hindsight Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 2,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,257 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (9,393 of 14,046 topics). This Stu Holden is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Stu Holden
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Oakland Culture1%
⁠0%Dive Bars1%
⁠34%Stu Holden (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,257
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stu Holden attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stu Holden vs sitewide
Stu Holden attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos