Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Street Trees results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 1,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (18,238 of 22,261 topics). This Street Trees is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Street Trees
Topic details
Total words: 3,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510018.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos