Topic summary
11%1 analyzed article/video3,821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strategic Investment Funds results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 773 hits. Analysis detected 5,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (17,814 of 17,969 topics). This Strategic Investment Funds is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Strategic Investment Funds
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Strategic Investment Funds attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Strategic Investment Funds vs sitewide
Strategic Investment Funds attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.