Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Statins results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 2,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Statins is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Statins

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Statins (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 4,026

Article count: 1

Authors

Elizabeth Cooney

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Statins attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Statins vs sitewide

Statins attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Statins and blood pressure drugs changing health risks of obesity, study suggests⁠^20%

STAT⁠^44%By Elizabeth Cooney⁠^32%7/1/2026, 3:30:00 PM