Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These State Vs Federal Investigation results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 496 hits. Analysis detected 1,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,443 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 21,744 topics). This State Vs Federal Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
State Vs Federal Investigation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,443
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 34.4%34.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 34.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos