Topic summary
66%1 analyzed article/video860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Senate Elections results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 754 hits. Analysis detected 2,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,618 of 21,603 topics). This State Senate Elections is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
State Senate Elections
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
State Senate Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
State Senate Elections vs sitewide
State Senate Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.