Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These State Mandates results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 332 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,789 topics). This State Mandates is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
State Mandates
Topic details
Total words: 2,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos