Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanley Cup Playoffs results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 5,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (8,502 of 13,018 topics). This Stanley Cup Playoffs is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Stanley Cup Playoffs
Topic details
Total words: 5,616
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stanley Cup Playoffs attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stanley Cup Playoffs vs sitewide
Stanley Cup Playoffs attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos