Topic summary

⁠81%1 analyzed article/video634 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Stanley Cup Engraving Controversy results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 4,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (3,530 of 12,436 topics). This Stanley Cup Engraving Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.

Stanley Cup Engraving Controversy

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Gender Identity	1%
⁠72%	Stanley Cup Engraving Controversy (selected)	5%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 2,536

Article count: 1

Authors

Greg Maresca

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Stanley Cup Engraving Controversy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Stanley Cup Engraving Controversy vs sitewide

Stanley Cup Engraving Controversy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Merit over privilege - Blogs⁠^61%

American Thinker⁠^94%By Greg Maresca⁠^82%7/15/2026, 4:00:00 AM