Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stand Your Ground Law results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Burden of Proof, and Straw Man, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 252 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,566 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,296 topics). This Stand Your Ground Law is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stand Your Ground Law
Topic details
Total words: 1,566
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos