Topic summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Dallas results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 172 hits . Analysis detected 999 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 53% (11,045 of 23,189 topics). This South Dallas is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. South Dallas
Topic details
Total words: 2,456
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst