Topic summary
51%1 analyzed article/video248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South China Sea Disputes results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 665 faulty-reasoning hits from 992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,119 of 21,201 topics). This South China Sea Disputes is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
South China Sea Disputes
Topic details
Total words: 992
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
South China Sea Disputes attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
South China Sea Disputes vs sitewide
South China Sea Disputes attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos