Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video1,369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Socialization results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 588 hits. Analysis detected 3,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (16,659 of 22,261 topics). This Socialization is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Socialization
Topic details
Total words: 5,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos