Topic summary

⁠20%1 analyzed article/video2,214 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Social Justice In Science results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 472 hits. Analysis detected 3,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,642 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (12,335 of 13,273 topics). This Social Justice In Science is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.

Social Justice In Science

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠8%	Social Justice In Science (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 6,642

Article count: 1

Authors

Michael Marshall

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Social Justice In Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Social Justice In Science vs sitewide

Social Justice In Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Many universities hold seized human remains. What should they do with them?⁠^17%

Science News⁠^5%By Michael Marshall⁠^27%7/17/2026, 2:00:00 PM