Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smartwatch Security results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 734 hits. Analysis detected 3,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (17,412 of 24,545 topics). This Smartwatch Security is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Smartwatch Security
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,632
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos