Topic summary

⁠6%1 analyzed article/video1,022 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Shark Conservation results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 1,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (19,062 of 21,469 topics). This Shark Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group.

Shark Conservation

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠0%	Summer Traditions	1%
⁠12%	Shark Conservation (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 4,088

Article count: 1

Authors

Harrison Tasoff for UCSB

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Shark Conservation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Shark Conservation vs sitewide

Shark Conservation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Understanding the Market for Shark Products: It’s Complicated⁠^7%

Noozhawk⁠^9%By Harrison Tasoff for UCSB⁠^6%8/1/2026, 4:00:00 PM