Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senior Programs results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 1,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (19,936 of 21,901 topics). This Senior Programs is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Senior Programs
Topic details
Total words: 4,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos