Topic summary
58%1 analyzed article/video1,068 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Election results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 514 hits. Analysis detected 3,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,296 of 20,921 topics). This Senate Election is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Senate Election
Topic details
Total words: 4,272
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Election attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Election vs sitewide
Senate Election attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos