Topic summary
ā 51%1 analyzed article/video920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Confirmation Process results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 529 hits. Analysis detected 2,623 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ā 55% (10,405 of 22,798 topics). This Senate Confirmation Process is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Senate Confirmation Process
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,680
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos