Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Senate Confirmation Hearing results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 866 hits. Analysis detected 2,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,726 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 13,026 topics). This Senate Confirmation Hearing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Senate Confirmation Hearing

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Senate Confirmation Hearing (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 3,726

Article count: 1

Authors

Pien Huang

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Senate Confirmation Hearing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Senate Confirmation Hearing vs sitewide

Senate Confirmation Hearing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

CDC director nominee Erica Schwartz faced questions in Senate hearing⁠^44%

WKNO FM⁠^0%By Pien Huang⁠^66%7/15/2026, 9:00:00 AM