Topic summary
ā 43%1 analyzed article/video380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Appointments results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ā 67% (4,078 of 12,186 topics). This Senate Appointments is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Senate Appointments
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Appointments attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Appointments vs sitewide
Senate Appointments attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.