Topic summary
60%1 analyzed article/video409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sedans results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 898 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,227 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,575 of 16,151 topics). This Sedans is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Sedans
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sedans attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sedans vs sitewide
Sedans attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.