Topic summary
ā 3%1 analyzed article/video344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seda Development Project results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 354 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ā 49% (8,653 of 16,802 topics). This Seda Development Project is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Seda Development Project
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Seda Development Project attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Seda Development Project vs sitewide
Seda Development Project attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.