Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video1,518 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Security Concerns results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 420 hits. Analysis detected 3,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (14,057 of 22,081 topics). This Security Concerns is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Security Concerns
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,072
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos