Topic summary

⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos2,139 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Scientific Misconduct results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 2,434 hits. Analysis detected 9,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,110 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (14,418 of 21,217 topics). This Scientific Misconduct is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.

Scientific Misconduct

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Back-To-School	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠32%	Scientific Misconduct (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 12,110

Article count: 2

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Scientific Misconduct attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Scientific Misconduct vs sitewide

Scientific Misconduct attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Memo Gives Blueprint For Investigating Fauci’s Massive ‘Curated Misinformation Effort’⁠^28%

The Federalist⁠^95%By Hans Mahncke⁠^75%8/3/2026, 4:37:38 AM

Fauci and the great Covid cover-up⁠^64%

spiked⁠^96%By Matt Ridley⁠^77%7/31/2026, 6:00:09 AM