Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video802 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Scientific Consensus results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (7,602 of 13,018 topics). This Scientific Consensus is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.

Scientific Consensus

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠42%	Scientific Consensus (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,208

Article count: 1

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Scientific Consensus attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Scientific Consensus vs sitewide

Scientific Consensus attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

False balance⁠^46%

Wikipedia⁠^0%4/20/2026, 6:49:33 PM