Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Science Funding results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 2,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 12,190 topics). This Science Funding is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Science Funding

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Gender Identity	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Science Funding (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 5,316

Article count: 1

Authors

Elvia Malagón

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Science Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Science Funding vs sitewide

Science Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

‘Shell-shocked’ Chicago scientists raise alarm about federal overhaul of research grant funding⁠^16%

WBEZ Chicago⁠^12%By Elvia Malagón⁠^0%7/8/2026, 10:30:00 AM