Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Communication results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,066 hits. Analysis detected 6,401 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,772 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,702 of 16,562 topics). This Science Communication is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Science Communication
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Science Communication attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Science Communication vs sitewide
Science Communication attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.