Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Maintenance results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 1,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (11,275 of 22,330 topics). This School Maintenance is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
School Maintenance
Topic details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.9%19.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos