Topic summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scams Targeting Seniors results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 286 faulty-reasoning hits from 448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,543 of 24,545 topics). This Scams Targeting Seniors is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Scams Targeting Seniors
Topic details
Total words: 448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510093.7% percentile
9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles448 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 17.2%17.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.3%6.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.7%16.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos