Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video1,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sats results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 825 hits. Analysis detected 6,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (6,020 of 12,641 topics). This Sats is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Sats
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Survival Stories1%
⁠0%Pizza Oven1%
⁠53%Sats (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,804
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sats attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sats vs sitewide
Sats attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos