Topic summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos2,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctions And Embargoes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,578 hits. Analysis detected 9,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,524 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 45% (7,267 of 13,023 topics). This Sanctions And Embargoes is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sanctions And Embargoes attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sanctions And Embargoes vs sitewide
Sanctions And Embargoes attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.