Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These San Francisco Civil Grand Jury results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 630 hits. Analysis detected 2,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,438 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 14,912 topics). This San Francisco Civil Grand Jury is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury vs sitewide
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.