Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These San Francisco Civil Grand Jury results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 630 hits. Analysis detected 2,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,438 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 14,912 topics). This San Francisco Civil Grand Jury is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury
Topic details
Total words: 3,438
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury vs sitewide
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos