Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salaries And Wages results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (10,327 of 24,545 topics). This Salaries And Wages is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Salaries And Wages
Topic details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos