Topic summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos6,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royal Family results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 3,123 hits. Analysis detected 26,376 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,344 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (11,808 of 13,023 topics). This Royal Family is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Royal Family
Topic details
Total words: 34,344
Article count: 8
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Royal Family attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Royal Family vs sitewide
Royal Family attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.