Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video1,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robin Hood Law results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,417 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,798 of 16,562 topics). This Robin Hood Law is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Robin Hood Law
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠17%Robin Hood Law (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,417
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Robin Hood Law attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Robin Hood Law vs sitewide
Robin Hood Law attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos