Topic summary

⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos1,100 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Research Grants results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 824 hits. Analysis detected 3,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,710 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,261 of 16,148 topics). This Research Grants is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.

Research Grants

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠62%	Research Grants (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,710

Article count: 2

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Research Grants attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Research Grants vs sitewide

Research Grants attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Oregon awarded $160M to expand the semiconductor industry and boost economic development⁠^3%

OPB⁠^4%By Allison Frost⁠^0%7/23/2026, 8:29:21 PM

White House admits it used keywords to kill billions worth of UC research grants⁠^65%

Berkeleyside⁠^31%By Mikhail Zinshteyn⁠^45% CalMatters⁠^33%7/22/2026, 5:56:44 PM