Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Relevance Fallacies results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Circular Reasoning, and Genetic Fallacy, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 677 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (9,063 of 13,018 topics). This Relevance Fallacies is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Relevance Fallacies
Topic details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Relevance Fallacies attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Relevance Fallacies vs sitewide
Relevance Fallacies attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.