Topic summary

⁠6%1 analyzed article/video1,022 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Regulatory Impact results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 1,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (18,968 of 21,370 topics). This Regulatory Impact is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group.

Regulatory Impact

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠0%	Summer Traditions	1%
⁠12%	Regulatory Impact (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 4,088

Article count: 1

Authors

Harrison Tasoff for UCSB

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Regulatory Impact attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Regulatory Impact vs sitewide

Regulatory Impact attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Understanding the Market for Shark Products: It’s Complicated⁠^7%

Noozhawk⁠^8%By Harrison Tasoff for UCSB⁠^6%8/1/2026, 4:00:00 PM