Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Regulatory Exceptions results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 661 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Regulatory Exceptions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Regulatory Exceptions
Topic details
Total words: 4,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 6.7%6.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 1.2%1.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos