Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Conflicts results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 210 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,659 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (11,527 of 24,545 topics). This Regional Conflicts is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Regional Conflicts
Topic details
Total words: 1,659
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos