Topic summary
⁠24%1 analyzed article/video1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Reckoning results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 2,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (14,240 of 22,261 topics). This Racial Reckoning is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Racial Reckoning
Topic details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos