Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video1,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial And Religious Politics results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 576 hits. Analysis detected 4,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (9,995 of 23,519 topics). This Racial And Religious Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Racial And Religious Politics
Topic details
Total words: 4,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos