Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quo Warranto results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,206 hits. Analysis detected 6,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (6,745 of 13,018 topics). This Quo Warranto is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Quo Warranto
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Oakland Culture1%
⁠0%Dive Bars1%
⁠49%Quo Warranto (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,955
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Quo Warranto attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Quo Warranto vs sitewide
Quo Warranto attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos