Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video1,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queer Identity results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,815 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (15,164 of 22,479 topics). This Queer Identity is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Queer Identity
Topic details
Total words: 4,668
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos