Topic summary
28%1 analyzed article/video603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pullman National Historical Park results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 1,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,809 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,783 of 16,562 topics). This Pullman National Historical Park is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Pullman National Historical Park
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Pullman National Historical Park attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Pullman National Historical Park vs sitewide
Pullman National Historical Park attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.